SMEpal

Tag Archive | "Windowsphone 7 series"

Microsoft policy in Windows phone 7 Series

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Microsoft policy in Windows phone 7 Series

Posted on 25 March 2010 by Ovie Albert

It is good to appreciate Microsoft and the windows phone 7 seeming anomalous marketing. It’s no one’s secret that windows mobile phones have been doing badly in sales as of recent. With the advent of the iphone and android in the mobile phone world, the fortunes of the windows mobile have been dwindling even further.

To understand Microsoft’s policy of appraising itself competitively against these behemoth “foes” you need to appreciate the diametrically opposing world of the Google Android Smartphone and the Apple iphone. One is closed and the other is open source. One has defined offering and quality assured products throughout the retail units of their mobile devices while the other have a powerful OS but ubiquitous mobile products.

Apple feels that users should have the same user interface on their device. This OS can be thus used across similar devices as part of a large ecosystem of Apple products. On the other hand, Android provides a solid open-source approach to their powerful Smartphone line-up, and many manufacturers are allowed to alter them and use them at their will.

You see in some instance, Samsung, HTC and even Acer, adding their own UI on top of the Android OS. So, when you buy an android product, you cannot predict to 100% accuracy what you get in terms of functionality or user interface. A Samsung Android phone may be different in operability from a Samsung or Motorola’s Android device. Even an android application that runs well in a HTC phone for instance may fail to launch on a Motorola Android phone. Perhaps Microsoft wants to avoid this!

Now, Microsoft wants to regulate and strictly enforce a minimum standard for their windows phone 7. They want to use the model depicted above for the Apple iphone into their Windows Phone 7 series. They want to have a closed ecosystem complete with even an apps store known as the windows phone 7 market place, where you can buy monitored apps, analogous to the Apple apps store format.

They want a situation in which if you buy a windows phone from Samsung in Lagos, Nigeria and buy another windows phone from HTC in the UK, You will have the same user experience and you can predict the UI, functionality and similar apps would run in both phones impeccably.

Merit
One of the problems facing the windows mobile is the same that may lurk out at the Android platform later on. This is an inherent problem in open source OS, which is a lack of standardization. And possibly, universality. With this new approach by Microsoft, they intend to bring about uniformity in their products and perhaps they will ensure a quality assurance too.

When you buy a windows mobile phone you are sure of the minimum RAM (256 MB), in built Memory (of at least 8GB), No removeable memory card, One of the three hard ware requirements and possibly upgradeable OS via later firmwares. There is also a quality regulated application store, where apps from third party manufacturers are scrutinized and approved ala Apple apps store format. Microsoft even promises a more open approach to its apps store.

This system also serves their enterprise partners well. There is nothing better than consistency in their Business enterprise users. Their core business enterprise users will have a choice of different manufacturers and third party applications with the assurance that they will get a single OS, the same UI, and apps interoperability, no matter the source of the Windows Phone 7 series.

Shortcomings
This attempt by Microsoft to revamp its OS is not without criticism albeit forthrightly. For one, it is not all about updating and repositioning, but taking into account the preferences of their users and customers.

This new policy has its controversies because Microsoft in their zeal to bring about their new OS, have dived headlong into it, and have ignored some of the mistakes of their arch rival, Apple. For the sake of simplicity this will be enumerated below:

1. No multi-tasking at launch. Microsoft does not want to include multi tasking ab initio in the WMP 7 so as to emulate this function of the iphone and for simplicity. Whether it is to improve battery life or just for a simple interface, no official reasons were given in the MIX event. Not long ago, the Apple iphone was criticized for lack of multi-tasking and from the intensity of this it was clear that users love this feature. Why Microsoft should ignore such as an astounding feature seems difficult to appreciate.

2. No removeable memory card. This is self explanatory.

3. No copy and paste; even the iphone corrected this shortcoming in their OS 3.0. update.

4. No flash in browser; The lack of flash baffles me. In fact they were able to put silverlight (Microsoft version of Flash) in the OS and UI but exclude it in the most important area that mattered which was the mobile internet browser.

5. Tightly regulated Apps store; this may serve as a strength as well as weakness. The Apple apps store has been criticized for its lack of openness. Let us see if that would not be the case with WMP 7 marketplace.

6. The closed environment or ecosystem; There are many people who love the Apple closed system. Others prefer openness and carrier/ manufacturers configurability of an existing OS. That is why the likes of IG (with due respect) will prefer to jailbreak their iphone to get an increased user-configurability. But whatever model you choose, the most important thing a user may prefer may be quality assurance and similar User interface and ease of use in all the Operating systems of one product.

You do not have to start learning again and mastering the User interface of an android phone or a windows mobile phone each time you change a Manufacturer. I, myself prefer a closed but quality assured user interface. Like the PC Windows 7 for instance. It is closed for instance, yet accepts so many third party software/applications.

Whether you buy windows 7 from Dell or Acer or HP, you know what you’ve bought. It has a single OS and UI in all and similar software will run similarly in all three manufacturers. Perhaps that is what Microsoft is after. But then, they should not starve the OS of features!

Conclusion
New devices running WMP 7 would not be out until the “Holidays”. Perhaps it is too early to tell if Microsoft has a winner in its hands. But suffice to say that their policy has merits and demerits. Microsoft has created an easy to use platform, and also removed the lackluster UI of windows mobile. They want to attempt to create a successful mobile model in line with their PC OS model.

The WMP OS is simple enough and allows developers to make good thirdparty applications. The iPhone was criticized before but they have gradually improved their features and are still improving and selling in droves. Perhaps Microsoft will tow the same line if it has a compelling and fluid UI like the iphone.

The taste of the pudding is in the eating, and perhaps we should just wait and see how all this turn out. What will surely help Microsoft will be further improvement of features with subsequent firmware or OS update. If their policy is well thought out, and if they offer accompanying compatible customer support, we just might have a winner in our hands.

Comments (1)

windowsphone

Tags: , , ,

Wp7S: No removable memory

Posted on 18 March 2010 by Mister Mobility

Okay, this is getting wierder by the day. Now, we are convinced that the Microsoft guys working on Windowsphone 7 Series slept and woke up waaaay back in 1980 or thereabouts.

How else do you explain all the features that are being excluded from Wp7S? First, it was multi-tasking, then copy and paste, and now removable memory. No microSD? No MiniSD? No cards at all.

Yes; we want to scream. But what’s that going to achieve?

Source. Incidentally, we notice that Afewgoodmen mentioned this in a recent comment he made on another article we published recently on Windowsphone 7 Series.

Comments (9)

wp7logo

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Wp7S: No multi-tasking; no side-loading; no copy-and-paste

Posted on 17 March 2010 by Mister Mobility

WMExperts have published news items confirming the following about WindowsPhone 7 Series:

  • 3rd party apps cannot run in the background; only apps from Microsoft can
  • Sideloading: the only way for consumers to get apps on Wp7S is to get them through marketplace
  • No copy-and-paste
  • Silverlight not available in Internet Explorer mobile, though Silverlight is built into Wp7S itself

It is looking like Wp7S is launching as what the first generation iPhone was. How smart is that?

It is almost unbelievable that Microsoft would do something like this. Would it really hurt them to give us the fancy user interface plus multi-tasking plus side-loading plus copy-and-paste?

Was it really that hard to implement these features that they had implemented for years in their existing mobile OS? Sounds like a step forward and three steps backwards to us. But, what do we know?

This strategy may work for Microsoft in terms of overall sales (it worked for the iPhone), but then Windowsphone will lose the patronage of mobile “power users”.

Read the full news items:

  1. Wp7S Apps: No Sideloading, (virtually) no background multitasking
  2. No copy-and-paste for Windows Phone 7 Series

Comments (2)

wp7-startscreen

Tags: , ,

What Consumers Care About and the Success of Products

Posted on 02 March 2010 by Mister Mobility

Microsoft’s announcements on the new Windows Phone 7 Series (can someone find a short, easy to ype, easy-to-write name for this please) has thrown up a lot of turbulence in the Windows mobile modding and hacking space.

For one, Microsoft says that manufactuirers will not be able to tamper with the new user interface. Clearly, Microsoft is after a unified experience across all Windowsphones. Which, we think, is a very good thing.

Microsoft has also announced that app development will be in .NET; not C++.

The questions are:

  1. Do consumers really care if a handful of geeks prefer a user interface they can skin and mod around, or are they more concerned about a user interface that works?
  2. Do consumers care about what programming language is behind the applications, or are they more concerned about apps that actually work the way they should? (Hint: seehow successful and loved Opera Mini has become, and its just J2ME)
  3. Do consumers care about hunting geek websites for the latest hacks and mods for their phones, or do they just want to buy the phone and actually put it to use?

Your guess is as good as ours. It is the same scenario of Windows (or Mac) versus Linux. Linux is only popular with a handful of geeks who want to type out command line instructions to use their phones as modems with their Linux boxes – something that consumers do not want to do.

While the efforts of HTC with theiir Sense UI layer on top of WP6 are commendable, we must not forget that such efforts sprang from Microsoft not taking the bull by the horns. While we love to see and play with custom ROMs from the modding community, we must remember that such customisations were necesarry in the first place because the WinMo 6 user platform did not deliver on certain features.

But now, Microsoft seems to have risen to the challenge and taken responsibility for its product. Those stop-gap solutions must of necessity give way to the new order. Only a tiny percentage of WinMo owners over the years have cared for a custom ROM. Hunting through pages of ROMs to narrow down options and then flashing one ROM after the other is not what the average consumer (who make up the huge chunk of mobile users) want to do, or are competent to do.

Oh, plus no-one grows a larger marketshare by dancing to the gallery of the minority of users – in this case geeks. RIM made a smart move by evolving their BlackBerry devices towards the consumer market and it has paid off for them. Apple hit it by targetting the consumer market, and we all know the story.

Microsoft wants a larger marketshare.They are going after the consumer from the very word Go.

Microsoft is going in the right direction with WP7s, it seems. How well they execute it though is going to be another matter. In addition, we now have three (3) Windowsphone options:

  1. Windows Mobile 6.5.X
  2. Windows Phone 6 Starter Edition (we absolutely think that this one is a bad idea)
  3. Windows Phone 7 Series

But perhaps having 6.5.x and 6 Starter Edition still leaves the small geek communities with toys to hack and mod all they want. One thing is certain, providing consumers with choices never seems to be a bad thing.

All we have to do now is with till the end of the year to see how well WP7s pans out.

Comments (3)

windows_phone_6_starter

Tags: ,

New Windows Phone 6® Starter Edition For New & Emerging Markets

Posted on 28 February 2010 by Mister Mobility

Right after Microsoft announced Windows Phone 7 Series, rumours began floating that they were going to offer it side-by-side a version of Windows Phone 6. Now, there seems to be an official confirmation of this – and we are ticked off.

Why? For one, the idea that this version is targetted at “emerging markets”.

Secondly, according to Bsquare, WP 6SE does not support 3G services on GSM networks.

Exactly what do these mean?

That African and Asian countries are the targets of WP 6SE? How did they arrive at this? Does it translate to cheaper devices? Experience shows that WindowsPhone devices are more expensive than same class devices from the competition. For example, the average non-3G WindowsPhone still costs an arm and a leg more than a 3.5G-enabled device from Symbian.

Note too that some of the most vibrant mobile markets on the planet are emerging economies – Nigeria, India, Brazil et al. These markets have much stronger 3G presence than some advanced economies have. The U.S. is an example of an advanced economy with horrible 3G presence.

How did this idea crystalize?

In closing, have you tried registering as a user at the official WindowsPhone 7 Series website? We did two weeks ago, and would you imagine that Nigeria was not initially on the list of supported countries? Apparently someone at Microsoft messed up big time. We were miffed big time. The good news, however, is that as at today Nigeria is now listed.

The laughable part is, there’s a section titled “My current phone is” on the registration form. The options presented there are:

  • A Windows phone
  • iPhone
  • Droid
  • Nexus One
  • Blackberry
  • Palm Pre
  • Other smartphone
  • Other

Apparently, Microsoft does not consider the world’s two largest smartphone platforms, Symbian, worth competing against. Plus, it is shortsightedness to list only specific products from Android and WebOS. Surely, the Droid and Nexus One account for only a small percentage of Android sales (though they may well be the current flagships).

Surely, Microsoft cannot be so shortsighted as not to see that emerging martkets currently make up some of the most vibrant smartphone markets?

Targetting non-3G devices at emerging markets? Doh! There goes Microsoft’s chance to expand the marketshare of WindowsPhone; and since Android does not seem to be into a show of strength in these parts yet, the chances of anyone knocking Symbian off as king of the smartphone jungle are still next to zero.

Sigh. And we were looking forward to some real competition.

Credits:
Story via WindowsMobile Experts

Comments (6)

wp7logo

Tags: ,

More Windowsphone 7 Series in action

Posted on 16 February 2010 by Mister Mobility

The guys over at MobileCrunch have three videos of Windowsphone 7 series running on an actual device. Here is one:

You can head over to MobileCrunch for more Windowsphone 7 series live action.

Comments (1)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

Text Ads

 

Turbo-charged Website Design

We design & code superb websites! Visit Alireta for details

 

Free "Unlimited" Web Hosting

Enjoy the best web hosting services with UNLIMITED features FREE for a whole year, no strings attached. Visit www.arthurwales.com/promo for details

 

Advertise in our Classifieds

N5,000 per month. Mail business@mobility.com.ng for enquiries.

 

RELATED SITES

  • SMEpal PR, publicity and exposure for small/medium enterprises
  • WapReview Covering the mobile web since 2004
SpreadMedia

Switch to our mobile site