Posted on 24 April 2009 by Dayo Olutunfese
Recently, I had a discussion with someone who was of the opinion that just because a mobile application has a price tag on it, it must be better than any freeware mobile application in its category.
Here is throwing the discussion open. What do you think? Do you agree with this opinion or do you have a different take?
Please note: whichever side you take, kindly provide example(s) to support you argument.
Look forward to hearing from you guys.
This post was written by
Dayo Olutunfese – who has written 56 posts on Mobility blog.
Dayo Olutunfese is a mobility consultant and seminar facilitator. He is on the staff of Mobility.
Send an Email
Related posts:
- Support for paid Android apps to consumers in 26 new African countries
- Z3 – Zain 3G – Limited to Post-Paid Plans Only?
- Glo “Biiiig Dash” coming to Post-paid lines
- Glo Introduces Pre-Paid 3G Packages
- Elite World post paid from Etisalat
April 24th, 2009 at 9:04 pm Browsing with
Free or not free, a mobile phone app must provide d use or purpose for which it was installed in d 1st place satisfactorily to d end user. I cant provide a specific example now but from experience, free apps are no less different from paid-for applications.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
April 25th, 2009 at 1:30 pm Browsing with
Azeez, good talk there about the need for an application to do exactly what it was developed to do. Whether it is freeware or commercial is immaterial.
OliveTree’s BibleReader is a freeware that gets the job done as good as commercial alternative. Opera Mini is another.
Like or Dislike:
0
0